This is the content of a submission I have made to Kildare County Council regarding the development of the former Magee Barracks in Kildare Town. The submission is in response to the recent public display of the current proposals for the site. These proposals are available from Kildare County Council.

In response to the recent public display of the current development for Magee Barracks, I would like to send your team the attached feedback. I have divided my comments into a number of broad sections: overall thoughts on the plan; development timelines; local infrastructure; giving the development a personality; community facilities; and the distribution of site uses.
I would also like to express my disappointment that the Barracks site has remained undeveloped for so long. It is now 10 years since the army pulled out, and with the exception of a temporary conversion to a refugee center, the site has languished unused.
The Government could have long ago designated the site as a hub for housing or commerce, but instead they delayed. Meanwhile, the biggest construction boom in the State’s history has been taking place, and I think it is disappointing and frustrating that the site was not developed when demand and the market were at their peak. Instead, we are now presented with an ambitious plan focussed on housing at a time when this sector is in decline.
I know this is outside your scope, but I do think it is worth saying nonetheless.
Feedback on the Public Display of the
Magee Barracks Development Plan
Dr Tony O’Donnell MIEI
November 30, 2007
Overall Plan
I appreciate the fact that the number of full market value units had to be increased in order to adequately fund the community facilities. However, this presupposes that all units can be sold, and that they can be sold at a return that will cover these costs. The current economic climate does not make this as inevitably successful as it would have been a few years ago.
Recent media reports point to 45,000 housing units currently on the market in Dublin alone, as well as 10,000 vacant properties. Housing completions are also predicted to drop off in the coming years. Given this difficulty in selling or renting what is already built and available in the city, I would have concerns about a plan to sell so many units in the commuter belt.
In addition to this, the number of social and affordable units also makes this development an unconventional (although not unique) proposition to potential buyers.
This raises a number of questions:
- Have the project team performed any analysis of the ability to successfully market the full value houses?
- What happens if some of these houses cannot be sold? Will any unsold full-price units be transferred to social or affordable status?
- If there is a reallocation of units, has the team or the council any thoughts on what impact this might have on the character of the development?
- If the balance shifts away from full-price houses, what will happen to the shortfall in moneys for the community facilities?
- If development is phased, will progress through the phases depend on whether previous ones have been successfully sold?
Development Timelines
From talking to some of the project team, I understand that you are likely to develop the site in phases. Have you considered the order in which these phases might be attempted? I would suggest that you complete the main arterial roads even if they are not initially needed to service the adjoining sites. I am particularly thinking of the distributor roads leading from Ruanbeg and the Dublin Road into the site and on to the Melitta Road. I think this would help integrate the site into the local psyche. It would also provide traffic relief for the Square.
What priorities will the team recommend when it comes to phasing the development? Will you have phases which are entirely housing, community or commercial, or will you try to blend development with components of each in a given phase?
I think the local community would like to see some community facilities coming on stream through the life of the project rather than having to wait until significant housing has been completed. This will help the community in general feel like owners of these facilities. If they are added in after the housing, it may give the appearance that they are facilities for the new residents.
Local Infrastructure
Rail
There are a number of chokepoints in the town at the moment. The train station is a good example as it is considerably beyond capacity for commuters. Almost every development in the town markets our rail service as a reason for people to move to Kildare. If you plan to do the same, then I hope you are lobbying Irish Rail to ensure that they can deliver services that meet the capacity requirements of the town. As an active member of the local rail group, I would also suggest that you put pressure on for additional parking at the station in advance of any development. I am sure the Kildare Rail Users Group (krugroup@gmail.com) would be willing to lend their voice to this.
Controlling Access on the Melitta Road
The distributor road exiting at the Melitta Road is bound to attract significant volumes of traffic. Do the team or the Council have any thoughts on how to manage this? It should be borne in mind that lights have recently been installed close to the planned exit. The potential redevelopment of the enterprise center might also produce a further focus for traffic exiting onto the Melitta Road.
Schools
While land has been zoned for education use, this does not necessarily mean a school is part of the plan. I understand that you are currently in consultation with the Department of Education about the provision of a primary school on the site. Bringing the delivery of the school into the tendering process for the other aspects of the development would presumably produce savings, so I hope the Department prove receptive.
I also think that the community would support you with this, so perhaps you might be able to strengthen your case by working with the community and elected representatives to advance your case.
Giving the Development a Personality
In the town at present, there are no large housing developments which double up as access routes for the rest of the community. I would hope that in time the Barracks is not seen as a housing estate with a road through it, but rather a distinctive quarter of the town that is integrated into the community. I think this could be encouraged in a number of ways.
Firstly I would suggest that physical borders are avoided where green areas interface with existing areas, for example at the Beech Grove border. This would give the impression that there is a seamless passage into the quarter. I would also hope that a number of types and styles of design are used in order to avoid the appearance of a monolithic development.
I would also suggest that different areas are given names which are grounded in the traditions and history of the town and locality, and are not the standard bland names used in so many modern estates. I would also suggest that you open up a discussion with the community about naming the distributor roads. It would be nice if they weren’t simply referred to by a purely functional name.
Community Facilities
As the original development plan was revised in order to produce more income for the development of community facilities, will the community have to wait for some or all of the housing to be completed before the delivery of the community facilities?
I would also have a concern that the community facility has moved from the Dublin Road end of the development to a location deep within a housing zone. This raises a number of worries for me.
Firstly, the previous plan meant that it would be straightforward to develop and access the community facility without any other development taking place; the new scenario would suggest that the facility will have to wait until the development reaches that area of the site before work begins. Is there any specific reason for moving the facility away from a perimeter area?
Secondly, placing it in the middle of a housing zone might place restrictions on operating hours and types of activity. For example, we have a number of drama groups and the second oldest drama festival in the country. If the facility included a performance space, do the team envisage any problems with neighbouring residents when they are faced with performances that run until 11 at night? Might the location unfairly prejudice the types of activity that the facility can support?
Distribution of Uses
I hope that there is some distribution of retail or commercial space through the housing areas, especially in the higher density areas. I understand from my conversations with team members that you are unlikely to have large areas of solely housing, so I would certainly encourage you in following this philosophy.